Well, I have to admit that I've been a little remiss lately. But, I hope that you all have been busy with your lives as I have been with mine.
But, let's talk some tennis now!
Looking back on the US Open here are some of my impressions.
Watching Federer play, all dressed in black tennis clothes, in some of the mid-tournament matches was like watching a great musician practicing! Fed was flawless at times and the more you watch Fed, the more you have to be aware of his brilliant movement. He is the most musical player out there. He moves with a dancer's grace and a musician's sense of rhythm.
On the other hand, this was the first tournament where I said to myself how much better Rafael Nadal would be if he had received classical coaching growing up. His movement relies too much on bursts of speed as opposed to great footwork. As I've discussed before, his serve has flaws --mainly his lack of a good serve wide in the deuce court --, and I think he often takes the ball too late on his forehand and hooks it too much at times.
So, I wasn't surprised at the play of Novak Djokovic. His game reminds me more of Federer than Nadal. He has a very good serve which wins him a lot of free points. He moves well and is very solid off both sides.
For me the rest of the year is exhibition tennis. I focus on my own game until the Australian Open in January.
So the next few months of posts will deal with our tennis --the club and state level variety.
By the way I hope you all have seen Djokovic do his tennis impersonations. They're hilarious!
I've added a page on my web site which provides links to youtube videos if you haven't yet seen the Djokester's tennis comedy act. Just click here Tennis Humor and then click on the link for Djokovic's Impersonations
Until next time,
Glenn Sheiner M.D. - author of Insider Tennis Strategies Tennis Strategy Tactics And Tips To Help You Improve Your Game guaranteed to make you a smarter tennis player and take your tennis to the next level. Also, check out the world's top tennis humor screensaver
Tennis Cartoon Screensaver. You can download a trial version for FREE.
Technorati Tags Tennis
Technorati Tags US Open
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Saturday, October 6, 2007
Roger Federer vs. Rod Laver
Laver and Federer were both born in August 43 years apart. Federer's birthday is August 08, 1981, while Laver's is August 09, 1938. It makes comparing them straightforward as the grand slams make up this way too. For example, Federer won his second Wimbledon in 2004 at the age of 22, while Laver won his first Wimbledon 1961, at the same age of 22. And so on.. get the drift?
Green shaded boxes represent Rod Laver playing in Pre-open Era amateur division. Blue boxes represent Rod Laver playing in Pre-open Era under Pro division, whose 3 Grand slam equivalents were French Pro, Wembley and US Pro. These divisions were eliminated in 1968 French Open with the beginning of the Open Era, represented in White boxes, however "contract" professionals were banned for several grand slams (shown in light blue boxes) due to conflicts between NTL, WCT and ITLF till 'true' Open Era started in 1972 US Open with the formation of ATP.
Note: RF/RR age is the age of both Roger Federer and Rod Laver when the tennis season starts (Jan 1). By the time they play US Open, they would have had their birthday and older by one year. (Like Federer won his first US Open at age 23, though he was 22 when the tennis season started).
Note2: Laver served at Australian Army in 1957 as indicated by 'a' for the last three slams of the season.
Data by Wikipedia, ITF & ATP.
Also see, Federer at Grand slam Singles Main draw.
Laver | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1961 | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 | 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | Career |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian | r32 | r32 | r16 | r16 | W | F | W | W | - | r16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | ||||||
French | r128 | -a | r64 | r32 | r32 | SF | W | F | F | F | F | W | F | W | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
Wimbledon | r128 | -a | r32 | F | F | W | W | QF | W | W | W | W | W | W | r16 | QF | - | - | - | - | - | r64 | 8 |
US Open | r128 | -a | r16 | QF | F | F | W | F | W | F | W | W | r16 | W | r16 | - | r16 | r32 | - | r16 | - | - | 5 |
RF/RL age | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 |
Federer | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Career |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian | q1 | 3r | 3r | 4r | 4r | W | SF | W | W | SF | F | W | SF | 4 | |
French | 1rw | 4r | QF | 1r | 1r | 3r | SF | F | F | F | W | QF | F | 1 | |
Wimbledon | 1rw | 1r | QF | 1r | W | W | W | W | W | F | W | QF | QF | 6 | |
US Open | q2 | 3r | 4r | 4r | 4r | W | W | W | W | W | F | SF | SF | 5 |
Green shaded boxes represent Rod Laver playing in Pre-open Era amateur division. Blue boxes represent Rod Laver playing in Pre-open Era under Pro division, whose 3 Grand slam equivalents were French Pro, Wembley and US Pro. These divisions were eliminated in 1968 French Open with the beginning of the Open Era, represented in White boxes, however "contract" professionals were banned for several grand slams (shown in light blue boxes) due to conflicts between NTL, WCT and ITLF till 'true' Open Era started in 1972 US Open with the formation of ATP.
Note: RF/RR age is the age of both Roger Federer and Rod Laver when the tennis season starts (Jan 1). By the time they play US Open, they would have had their birthday and older by one year. (Like Federer won his first US Open at age 23, though he was 22 when the tennis season started).
Note2: Laver served at Australian Army in 1957 as indicated by 'a' for the last three slams of the season.
Data by Wikipedia, ITF & ATP.
Also see, Federer at Grand slam Singles Main draw.
Roger Federer vs. Bjorn Borg vs. Rafael Nadal
Similar to Roger Federer vs. Pete Sampras summary, here's an attempt to match the Swedish ice-man, Björn Borg's achievements against Roger.
Federer's birthday is August 08, 1981, while Borg's is June 6, 1956. So, they are 25 years apart, which makes it convenient to compare them. Some similarities include Borg is 0/9 at US Open where Roger has won four straight times, like Federer is 0/9 at French Open where Borg has won six including four straight. Borg and Federer were known to be brats during junior days and then developed an ice-cool demeanor later on. Also, both Borg and Federer has won Wimbledon five straight times, an all-time record and both are junior Wimbledon champions as well.
Also, during the era when Borg played, Australian was not considered a serious slam and most of the pros never played them, at least not consistently like modern pros do.
Update: Added Nadal as well - as a sheer coincidence, Nadal was born 30 years apart on June 3, 1986. Both being at the top of their game from a very early age and the eerie similarity of their success at French Open as well.
Note: RF/BB age is the age of both Roger Federer and Bjorn Borg when the tennis season starts (Jan 1). By the time Borg played Wimbledon and Federer play US Open, they would have had their birthday and older by one year. (Like Federer won his first US Open at age 23, though he was 22 when the tennis season started).
Data by Wikipedia.
Also Federer at Grand slam Singles Main draw.
Federer's birthday is August 08, 1981, while Borg's is June 6, 1956. So, they are 25 years apart, which makes it convenient to compare them. Some similarities include Borg is 0/9 at US Open where Roger has won four straight times, like Federer is 0/9 at French Open where Borg has won six including four straight. Borg and Federer were known to be brats during junior days and then developed an ice-cool demeanor later on. Also, both Borg and Federer has won Wimbledon five straight times, an all-time record and both are junior Wimbledon champions as well.
Also, during the era when Borg played, Australian was not considered a serious slam and most of the pros never played them, at least not consistently like modern pros do.
Update: Added Nadal as well - as a sheer coincidence, Nadal was born 30 years apart on June 3, 1986. Both being at the top of their game from a very early age and the eerie similarity of their success at French Open as well.
Borg | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | Career |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian | - | 3r | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | ||||||
French | 4r | W | W | QF | - | W | W | W | W | 6 | ||||||
Wimbledon | QF | 3r | QF | W | W | W | W | W | F | 5 | ||||||
US Open | 4r | 2r | SF | F | 4r | F | QF | F | F | 0 | ||||||
Nadal | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Career |
Australian | - | 3r | 4r | - | QF | SF | W | QF | QF | 1 | ||||||
French | - | - | W | W | W | W | 4r | W | W | 6 | ||||||
Wimbledon | 3r | - | 2r | F | F | W | - | W | F | 2 | ||||||
US Open | 2r | 2r | 3r | QF | 4r | SF | SF | W | 1 | |||||||
Federer | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Career |
Australian | j-F | q1 | 3r | 3r | 4r | 4r | W | SF | W | W | SF | F | W | SF | 4 | |
French | j-1r | 1rw | 4r | QF | 1r | 1r | 3r | SF | F | F | F | W | QF | F | 1 | |
Wimbledon | j-W | 1rw | 1r | QF | 1r | W | W | W | W | W | F | W | QF | QF | 6 | |
US Open | j-SF | q2 | 3r | 4r | 4r | 4r | W | W | W | W | W | F | SF | SF | 5 | |
BB/RN /RF age | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Note: RF/BB age is the age of both Roger Federer and Bjorn Borg when the tennis season starts (Jan 1). By the time Borg played Wimbledon and Federer play US Open, they would have had their birthday and older by one year. (Like Federer won his first US Open at age 23, though he was 22 when the tennis season started).
Data by Wikipedia.
Also Federer at Grand slam Singles Main draw.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)