Thursday, May 6, 2010

Rome: The Great Leggings Crisis.


I love it when the players wear leggings. And while we’re on the topic - sleeves rock too.


It lends itself to a cosier, organic world view of the sport in which we, mere mortals, get to believe we’re not that far removed from it’s elite.


Venus of course, with her willowy frame, takes things to another level. The sixties, jewel heists, Audrey Hepburn – that sort of thing.


venus


Fair enough? Good. Coz everything’s changed.


When Dementcha took to court in both sleeves and leggings yesterday, I may have been mildly amused, but was veering more towards wondering why I’d only seen her try it out once before – it seemed to sit well with both her athleticism, and more pragmatic, image-is-not-quite-everything approach to tennis.


We all know what happened there.


Ana followed that up with a 6-2 7-5 win over Nadia today. A quite heinous first set from Petrova, but let me unmask the real culprit: Baby-blue (sleeved) worn over suitably sleek black leggings.


# DA-DAH-DAAAAH!


Picking apart JJ’s 6-0 6-1 demolition of Venus today, two things seem to stick out.


The first is JJ’s impeccable performance. Not especially surprising given she’d been playing well all week. On the other hand, I’ve not seen this level from her since 2007 or thereabouts.


The second involves more of those black leggings - teal sleeves over black leggings to be precise. And not even the fact that she wore it so well, would prevent Venus from being engulfed in it’s fury.


Serena, Jelena, Ana and MJMS left standing. Neither wore leggings of any sort. Just saying.


No longer surprised at Bepa’s first round exit. She’s got a rather lot to answer for don’t you think?


(Photo: AP)


Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Face Of The Day

Yanina Wickmayer of Belgium reacts after losing her match against  Jelena Jankovic of Serbia at the Rome Masters tennis tournament in Rome  May 5, 2010.

Yanina Wickmayer of Belgium reacts after losing her match against Jelena Jankovic of Serbia at the Rome Masters tennis tournament in Rome May 5, 2010.

::

INTERNAZIONALI BNL D'ITALIA

Singles - Third Round
(1/WC) Serena Williams (USA) d. Andrea Petkovic (GER) 62 36 60
María José Martínez Sánchez (ESP) d. (2) Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) 64 62
(4) Venus Williams (USA) d. (16) Shahar Peer (ISR) 63 64
Ana Ivanovic (SRB) d. (6) Elena Dementieva (RUS) 61 76(5)
(7) Jelena Jankovic (SRB) d. (11) Yanina Wickmayer (BEL) 62 60
Lucie Safarova (CZE) d. (8) Agnieszka Radwanska (POL) 16 63 76(1)
(14) Nadia Petrova (RUS) d. Alexandra Dulgheru (ROU) 60 36 62
Maria Kirilenko (RUS) d. Dominika Cibulkova (SVK) 46 61 61

Doubles - Quarterfinals
(4) Raymond/Stubbs (USA/AUS) d. Rosolska/Shvedova (POL/KAZ) 26 61 10-5

Doubles - Second Round
(1) Huber/Petrova (USA/RUS) d. Hercog/Peer (SLO/ISR) 36 62 10-4
Kirilenko/Pavlyuchenkova (RUS/RUS) d. (3) Black/Vesnina (ZIM/RUS) 62 ret. (Vesnina: low back injury)
(5) Mattek-Sands/Yan (USA/CHN) d. Hlavackova/Savchuk (CZE/UKR) 75 60
(6) Dulko/Pennetta (ARG/ITA) d. Keothavong/Petkovic (GBR/GER) 62 62

::

Estoril Open

Singles - Second Round
(2) Sorana Cirstea (ROU) d. (WC) Michelle Larcher de Brito (POR) 75 75
(4) Anabel Medina Garrigues (ESP) d. Ekaterina Makarova (RUS) 62 63
(7) Peng Shuai (CHN) d. Tatjana Malek (GER) 62 61
Anastasija Sevastova (LAT) d. Kimiko Date Krumm (JPN) 61 42 ret. (right calf strain)
Arantxa Parra Santonja (ESP) d. Julia Goerges (GER) 36 75 62
Anastasia Rodionova (AUS) d. Stefanie Voegele (SUI) 64 26 63
(Q) Arantxa Rus (NED) d. Kirsten Flipkens (BEL) 76(4) 61
(LL) Jarmila Groth (AUS) d. Kristina Barrois (GER) 26 61 75

Doubles - Quarterfinals
Diatchenko/Védy (RUS/FRA) d. (2) Czink/Parra Santonja (HUN/ESP) 75 26 10-6
Jugic-Salkic/Jurak (BIH/CRO) d. (3) Barrois/Woehr (GER/GER) 64 76(4)

Doubles - First Round
(1) Cirstea/Medina Garrigues (ROU/ESP) d. Fichman/Washington (CAN/USA) w/o (Fichman: right hamstring muscle strain)
Manasieva/Olaru (RUS/ROU) d. Rodionova/Wozniak (AUS/CAN) 63 64

Men's Singles - Second Round
[1] R Federer (SUI) d B Phau (GER) 63 64
[4] A Montanes (ESP) d D Gimeno-Traver (ESP) 61 62
[8] P Cuevas (URU) d M Granollers (ESP) 76(8) 76(2)
A Clement (FRA) d A Falla (COL) 64 63

Men's Doubles - Quarterfinals
S Huss (AUS) / A Sa (BRA) d X Malisse (BEL) / D Norman (BEL) 64 64

Men's Doubles - First Round
[1] P Cuevas (URU) / M Granollers (ESP) d J Chela (ARG) / N Massu (CHI) 63 63
[3] A Clement (FRA) / R Lindstedt (SWE) d [WC] F Gil (POR) / R Machado (POR) 76(6) 76(4)
R Bopanna (IND) / A Qureshi (PAK) d [4] C Fleming (GBR) / K Skupski (GBR) 26 63 10-5
G Garcia-Lopez (ESP) / A Montanes (ESP) d A Falla (COL) / S Giraldo (COL) 62 26 10-7

::

BMW Open

Singles - First Round
[1] M Cilic (CRO) d M Berrer (GER) 64 62
[4] P Kohlschreiber (GER) d D Brands (GER) 64 64
[6] N Almagro (ESP) d K Vliegen (BEL) 63 61
K Anderson (RSA) d M Zverev (GER) 65 ret. (rib)
S Ventura (ESP) d O Dolgopolov Jr. (UKR) 67(5) 63 63

Singles - Second Round
[2] M Youzhny (RUS) d A Beck (GER) 63 63
[3] T Berdych (CZE) d [Q] P Riba (ESP) 75 61
J Hajek (CZE) d [8] [WC] B Becker (GER) 64 60
P Petzschner (GER) d D Koellerer (AUT) 61 64

Doubles - First Round
[2] M Fyrstenberg (POL) / M Matkowski (POL) d O Dolgopolov Jr. (UKR) / S Greul (GER) 61 62
[3] E Butorac (USA) / M Kohlmann (GER) d J Coetzee (RSA) / K Vliegen (BEL) 63 36 13-11
[4] O Marach (AUT) / S Ventura (ESP) d P Marx (GER) / I Zelenay (SVK) 57 63 10-6
M Ancic (CRO) / J Knowle (AUT) d [WC] P Kohlschreiber (GER) / K Krawietz (GER) 62 57 10-8
C Kas (GER) / P Petzschner (GER) d S Lipsky (USA) / D Martin (USA) 76(3) 76(7)

::

Serbia Open

Singles - Second Round
[3] S Querrey (USA) d E Korolev (KAZ) 63 64
[4] S Wawrinka (SUI) d [Q] A di Mauro (ITA) 61 64
I Andreev (RUS) d [5] I Karlovic (CRO) 64 75
[6] V Troicki (SRB) d F Serra (FRA) 60 61

Doubles - First Round
[2] R Hutchins (GBR) / J Kerr (AUS) d J Marray (GBR) / J Murray (GBR) 63 62
S Gonzalez (MEX) / T Rettenmaier (USA) d F Fognini (ITA) / A Seppi (ITA) 36 63 10-5
O Rochus (BEL) / M Russell (USA) d Y Allegro (SUI) / L Zovko (CRO) 63 64

Rome: Ana’s Back…sorta

Ana Ivanovic has won three matches in a row.


I kid ye not - two of those were top ten wins.


Linz 2008, for the wannabe-eggheads amongst you, was the last time that happened.


ana


When I heard she’d put out Vesnina (a player ranked 26 spots above her), I put it down to chance.


When I heard she’d taken down Vika, I put it down to injury.


As I watched her opposite Dementieva today, there was little doubt in my mind I was seeing a player transformed (That doesn’t mean I approve of all the changes, but we’ll get back to that).


You’ll hear it said often enough over the next 24 hours, so let me just observe right out that Dementcha was not at the races. Disembowel anyone that tries to tell you otherwise.


I just don’t think it matters very much is all and, in any case, doesn’t account for the radical way in which Gunhardt appears to have gone about stripping down and gutting out Ana’s game – before seemingly rebuilding it from the ground up.


Which you might argue is exactly what was required (She’d done the whole one-step-fwd-two-steps-back dance for nearly two years).


Gone, I hope, is the over-pressing, try-hard neurotic – the one that likes to paint all her misgivings as being born of “perfectionism” – and in her place sits a focused but chancy competitor. I did say I hope.


What immediately leaps out at you is how she’s no longer as interested in going for the lines – electing instead in favour of a greater margin for error, mostly (it must be said) through increased spin and height over the net.


That’s right folks, Ana’s gone down the grinders route, much in the way Novak did in 2008. He’s not been the same ever since.


Though I’m more inclined to agree that this was the right thing to do in Ana’s case seeing as how the levels of toxicity present in her game had breached all internationally agreed limits, and how taking the pressure off herself in this way seems to have allowed her to relax. She’s certainly not spraying errors anymore.


There’s also the beefier serve of course, which no longer appears to suffer from those giddy ball tosses, and which dug her out of many tough spots today.


What happens from this point on is largely down to her opponents and whether or not Ana’s in her happy place.


At her best she now seems capable of exactly the kinds of changes in pace and direction missing from her tennis philosophy only a few months ago (the word “texture” was mentioned). That I like.


At its worst, it’s little more than pushing (which would likely quickly be seized upon by a more demanding presence than Elena proved to be today).


But you know what? She doesn’t appear to care. For now it’s good enough to have her winning matches again, so I can’t in all honesty say that I do either.


Over in Estoril, some guy called Roger Federer won his first clay court match of the season. From what I hear he’s considered a good bet for the French Open, though he himself insists he’s not the favourite.


He’s right.


(Photo: AP)


Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Face Of The Day

ROME - MAY 02:  Serena Williams of USA speaks to the press during  the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour at the Foro Italico Tennis Centre on May 2,  2010 in Rome, Italy.
Getty

Serena Williams speaks to the press during the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour at the Foro Italico Tennis Centre on May 2, 2010 in Rome, Italy.

::

Hope the Australian Open champion is at least fit and can win more than one match. Her draw is tricky.

The defending Roland Garros champ is already out.

::

Monday, May 3, 2010

Singles - Second Round
Maria Kirilenko (RUS) d. (5) Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS) 62 36 64

Singles - First Round
(11) Yanina Wickmayer (BEL) d. (Q) Karolina Sprem (CRO) 63 16 64
(12) Flavia Pennetta (ITA) d. (Q) Akgul Amanmuradova (UZB) 62 63
(13) Francesca Schiavone (ITA) d. Daniela Hantuchova (SVK) 36 62 62
(16) Shahar Peer (ISR) d. (WC) Corinna Dentoni (ITA) 62 61
Aravane Rezai (FRA) d. (Q) Ayumi Morita (JPN) 64 62
Dominika Cibulkova (SVK) d. (LL) Pauline Parmentier (FRA) 61 36 75
Yaroslava Shvedova (KAZ) d. (Q) Bojana Jovanovski (SRB) 62 62
Lucie Safarova (CZE) d. Olga Govortsova (BLR) 62 67(9) 63
Alexandra Dulgheru (ROU) d. Sara Errani (ITA) 26 61 64
Patty Schnyder (SUI) d. Gisela Dulko (ARG) 67(5) 62 76(5)
Timea Bacsinszky (SUI) d. Sandra Zahlavova (CZE) 60 64
Ana Ivanovic (SRB) d. Elena Vesnina (RUS) 61 63
Roberta Vinci (ITA) d. Alisa Kleybanova (RUS) 76(6) 76(5)
Katarina Srebotnik (SLO) d. (Q) Varvara Lepchenko (USA) 67(2) 75 63
(Q) Bethanie Mattek-Sands (USA) d. Melanie Oudin (USA) 61 63

Doubles - Second Round
(2) Llagostera Vives/Martínez Sánchez (ESP/ESP) d. Poutchek/Senoglu (BLR/TUR) 62 60

Doubles - First Round
(8) Chuang/Govortsova (TPE/BLR) d. (WC) Brianti/Camerin (ITA/ITA) 62 76(4)
Errani/Vinci (ITA/ITA) d. Kudryavtseva/Zalameda (RUS/USA) 62 61
Kirilenko/Pavlyuchenkova (RUS/RUS) d. Azarenka/Zvonareva (BLR/RUS) 62 75
Rosolska/Shvedova (POL/KAZ) d. Borwell/Kops-Jones (GBR/USA) 75 62
Dushevina/Jans (RUS/POL) d. (WC) Dentoni/Oprandi (ITA/ITA) 64 57 10-3

Sunday, May 2, 2010

There He Goes Again

Spain's Rafael Nadal looks at his trophy after beating his  compatriot David Ferrer during their ATP Tennis Open match on May 2,  2010 in Rome. Nadal won 7-5;6-2.
Getty


Spain's Rafael Nadal looks at his trophy after beating his compatriot David Ferrer during their ATP Tennis Open match on May 2, 2010 in Rome. Nadal won 7-5;6-2.

::

Once he remembered how to win...

I had a lot going on today. Con Leche, our goat, gave birth to twins. And I'm still behind with my spring planting. I didn't get to watch much tennis.

But there's the former world No. 1 doing what he does better than anyone else playing the game today: winning titles on clay.

Rome, Stuttgart Round Up…


Apologies for the lack of coverage. There’s a phrase you thought you’d never hear.


The apology is as much to myself as anyone else seeing as how Rome is meant to be my favourite clay court event.


Plenty of happenings this week, both of the Romanic and Germanic variety - no time to luxuriate in any one of them I’m afraid. Well maybe just this one.



Oh yes, we could indulge in a spot of trophy-biting again, but I much prefer Rafa doing his prancing leprechaun thing – don’t you?



Comeback complete….I should say.


With not a damn pachyderm in sight.


I’m sure there was a spanking great final played in Rome today, and congrats to Ferru for making his first Masters final and all that – I just didn’t happen to see very much of it.


As far as I’m concerned the real final took place on this very same arena 24 hours ago.


Up until that point Rafa’s dirt-ridden comeback, however dominant, remained possessed of a certain liminality – one that would seemingly only be removed by his taking down a shotmaker in cold blood.


Mission accomplished, though Ernie ensured there was nothing cold about it.


That’s the sound of pedantic analysis being swept away by a deluge of unbridled optimism.



-- Over in in Stuttgart, Juju picked up her first title of Career 2.0. with a 6-4 2-6 6-1 win over Sam Stosur, who, incidentally, will be world #8 on Monday.


Trouble is it wasn’t terribly convincing. One wonders what the result would have, could have been, had Stosur retained the focus that saw her reach a ten-match clay court streak. Similar levels of shoddiness pervaded JuJu’s route through the entire draw – with forehand-vulgaris putting in the odd, unwelcome appearance.


Difficult to complain very much when someone subdues a field comprised of seven of the world’s top ten players, without playing their best tennis.


One only wonders if such sloppier performances are to be a more regular feature of her second coming.


And whether shaping her entire comeback tour around Wimby, perhaps at the expense of her signature surface, is in fact the best approach.


Allez…I think.


-- At start of the week I confess I rather dissed Ernests Gulbis as “a haircut and a forehand” (after checking with Lendl of course).


Now I’m thinking “a haircut, a forehand and a drop shot too”, and a lot more besides - I’m also positively Samsonesque in my insistence he not clip those locks of his.


Monte Schmonte. Right here’s where the clay court season began. And when one of our most vaunted debutantes elected to announce himself.


***


And now a moments reflection for those no longer with us – or, to be more precise, those running a little thin on presence lately.


1) Biggest of big fish first.


Federer going out early at a Masters event no longer surprises anyone. I’ve long since given up trying to make sense of it. Think of it as the new world order.


Don’t have much time for the weary assumption that he doesn’t accord Masters events the same degree of respect and/or attention (Slams are ostensibly bigger fish, but how precisely does one go about marking down their levels of commitment by the commensurate 1000 ATP points?).


Easier to believe the less forgiving three set format and increased competition of the second half of his reign has something to do with it.


2) Oh Muzza….you almost had me convinced.


For one match only he played the kind of tennis that might have left you thinking, “Crisis? What Crisis?”.


Then of course he ran into Daveed Ferrer, and it was all revealed as a sham.


Not out of the thick of it just yet then, and clay will likely never host his best results, but perhaps some evidence that the Muzzanomic downturn might be shorter lived than initially anticipated.


3) Djoko shouldn’t actually be part of this list, seeing as how I thought he gave a great account of himself – his loss to Dasco certainly bore little resemblance to the haemorrhaging at Monte, and were it not for Ernie and Nadal the very next day, would have been the match of the event.


4) Dinara’s resurfaced. It didn’t last very long. Don’t call her Dina (Dinarik, or Dinarochka’s ok).


(Photos: Getty, Reuters, AFP)


Saturday, May 1, 2010

Playing Women

 tennis coaching tennis tactics In today's world, there are a lot of excellent female players at clubs all over the world.

And, if you're club is like mine, there are a lot of men who really don't want to lose to a woman.

The problem for a lot of the guys is that the women might actually be better players technically.

My observation is that women in general have better backhands than guys, and guys tend to rely much more on power, speed, and a big serve and forehand. Very few women seem to have one-handed backhands, they tend to have very solid two-handers, whereas a lot of guys still have slice backhands and rely on running around to hit forehands.

I fall into the latter category although I also have a two-hander. However, I've observed that it's very difficult to win baseline rallies consistently if you're constantly are at a disadvantage with one pattern -- especially backhand to backhand.

So, here a few generic thoughts about how to beat women.

First of all, if you have a good serve, you must capitalize on it. And, this might involve serving and volleying which is something most women aren't familair with playing against.

Secondly, I've observed that getting balls high can bother wome more than pace. So, if you're able to hit a very high, bouncing, topspin stroke this could be very effective.

Third, try to stretch the court wide and make it a speed game . Do this only if you're the faster player, as otherwise it might work against you.

Fourth, hit a lot of short slice and drop shots to turn it into a short ball/ volley game instead of a groundstroker game.

Lastly, get your ego out of the way. If you're playing not to lose, you're probably going to lose.

Of course, there are exceptions to every rule, but I haven't seen too many serve and volleying women at my club.
Until next time,


Glenn Sheiner M.D. - author of Insider Tennis Strategies Tennis Tactics To Help You Beat The Women At Your Club guaranteed to make you a smarter tennis player and take your tennis to the next level. Also, check out the world's top tennis humor screensaver
Tennis Cartoon Screensaver
. You can download a trial version for FREE.

Technorati Tags
 
Copyright TENNIS CAMP - Powered by Home Recordings
ProSense theme converted by Blogger Template l wong2band l Gwaw.